Aa

Adjust size of text

Aa

Follow us and continue the conversation

Your saved articles

You haven't saved any articles

What are you looking for?

NCJWA stands by its collaboration with NIF over seminars on women

Melinda Jones
Print this
2

Published: 5 November 2021

Last updated: 4 March 2024

MELINDA JONES: In the wake of NIF's criticism of the IHRA definition of antisemitism, NCJWA's decision to hold joint seminars with NIF has prompted warnings that other groups will hesitate to engage with us, and benefactors may withdraw

ONE OF THE MANY things we have learnt throughout Covid is the enormous strength of our community and the great diversity within it. Previously unexpected alliances and collaborations have resulted from the need to move online, to reach people who are isolated and could not access community in the usual way.

We have also learnt that women have come out worse on every measure, as a result of the impact of Covid and the policies in place around it. Never has it been so obvious that the failure to apply a gender lens has devastating consequences on half the population.

The National Council of Jewish Women Australia is very concerned about violence against women, economic disparity, lack of gender representation and trafficking in women. We are concerned about antisemitism and misogyny - which have the same root and of which many Jewish women are victims.

We are concerned that while there is a gap in the treatment of indigenous and non-indigenous people, it is acceptable in society to treat some people as less than equal - and this is not ok. 

Because women are part of almost every organisation, and where they are not, they very often should be, NCJWA is concerned with the work and operation of every single group in the Jewish community. Our aim is the empowerment of all women and the widespread understanding of how policies, processes and behaviour disempowers women.

The criteria for working with another organisation is not “do we agree with everything they say and do?” but “can they reach women and together can we improve the position of women?”

During 2021, the national board of NCJWA has collaborated in programming with individuals from 26 organisations. Some of them hold conflicting ideological positions - which makes it impossible for us to endorse any 100%. Consider the position of Orthodox Jewish women, Haredi women, Reform women and secular women all contributing to the way our members can gain strength.

It is curious that the first time it has been controversial for us to collaborate is ... with the New Israel Fund (NIF) Australia.

They disagree with each other fundamentally. As an organisation, NCJWA agrees and disagrees with them each in turn. Historically, Orthodox women have been outsiders, because everyone felt that to work with Orthodox was to take a stand while to act as secular or Reform was not! We have no desire to exclude any Jewish women from what we are doing and that inevitably means embracing people from every political, religious, spiritual persuasion.

It is curious that the first time it has been controversial for us to collaborate was not our session involving a member of the Maritime Workers Union or the Radical Feminist CATWA, but our collaboration with the New Israel Fund (NIF) Australia. The topic of our collaboration is the “empowerment of women” - a matter on which our values completely align. 

NCJWA has a policy about collaboration:

NCJWA will collaborate with other organisations in order to further our agenda of the empowerment of women. Collaboration with another organisation does not indicate that NCJWA supports all initiatives, actions or beliefs of the outside organisation. It is crucial to distinguish between collaboration for a common goal and the endorsement of actions, policies or conversation the other organisations partake in.

Our policy on collaboration makes clear that we see it as a means of growth and development, and that our willingness to collaborate and to work with other organisations is one of our strengths. It allows us to reach audiences we may not otherwise reach and to put our views to groups which otherwise may not hear them. We thank all those who have worked with us in the past and are grateful to those, like NIF, with whom the collaboration is present or future.

NIF has taken a position about the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which is very much in the headlines. Its position is NOT NCJWA’s position.

From our point of view, there is one downside of the decision to run sessions with the New Israel Fund (NIF) Australia right now. And that is the unfortunate timing of the collaboration. NIF has taken a position about the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism, which is very much in the headlines. Its position IS NOT NCJWA’s position. In fact, NCJWA was one of the organisations that advocated to bring the IHRA definition to the Australian government.

We are proud of the very small role we played in this, and without hesitation stand by our belief in its importance in fighting the pervasive and pernicious onslaught of antisemitism we face today.

As a result of the collaboration, NCJWA has been warned that it will lead to hesitancy from other groups to engage with us.

NIF has been criticised both in the media and others online for the position they have taken. As a result of the collaboration NCJWA has been warned by others that it will lead to hesitancy from other groups to engage with us. We have also been warned that benefactors who, like NCJWA have a different position around the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism, will no longer wish to engage with NCJWA.

We have been warned that benefactors who, like NCJWA have a different position around the IHRA definition, will no longer wish to engage with us.

Collaboration and community building are basic feminist principles. We work with others to illuminate the commonalities whilst recognising that there may be many matters upon which we disagree. We disagree with NIF about the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism. I have no idea if they have discussed the Nordic Model of prostitution and endorse our view on this. Nonetheless, we both want a better world for women. That’s what we are collaborating on. That is the desired outcome of the collaboration.

Despite the anxiety and push back we have received, these sessions will be going ahead.

Despite the anxiety and push back that we have received, these sessions will be going ahead. We do not want to deny our members or any others who wish to enhance their skills from the opportunity these sessions will offer.

Collaboration with purpose is a key to NCJWA’s community building strategy. Perhaps we should be thought of as a single-issue party or a single spotlight shining on women.  We will work with anyone who shares the value of supporting women and promoting women’s safety and equality.

We care about Jewish women as women, Jewish women as Jews and Australian Jewish women as Australians. We engage wherever there are women – and that is everywhere. By collaboration we can reach more women and have women on the agenda of more organisations. If you are interested in working together to empower women, please be in touch.

About the author

Melinda Jones is President of the National Council of Jewish Women of Australia (NCJWA), and a feminist human rights lawyer

The Jewish Independent acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and strive to honour their rich history of storytelling in our work and mission.

Enter site